•Tinubu polls 4.1m, Atiku 3m, Obi 1.6m in 14 states
•APC wins in Ekiti, Kwara, Ondo, Oyo, Ogun, JIgawa
•PDP in Osun, Yobe, Gombe, Adamawa, Katsina
•LP in Lagos, Enugu, Nasarawa
•What the law says
The Presidential candidates of the ruling All Progressives Congress; main opposition Peoples Democratic Party, PDP; and Labour Party, were locked in a tight race, last night as results of the February 25 elections trickled in yesterday.
So far, results from 14 states have been declared by the National Chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission, INEC, Professor Mahmood Yakubu, who is the Chief Returning Officer for the presidential polls.
From the results, the APC Presidential Candidate, Asiwaju Bola Tinubu is leading, followed by PDP’s Alhaji Atiku Abubakar, and Mr. Peter Obi of the LP.
According to the results as presented at the National Collation Centre in Abuja, Tinubu has 4,105,663, Alhaji Atiku Abubakar has 3,052,625 votes, and Mr. Peter Obi has 1,643,069 votes.
Although, Tinubu is leading with 1.1 million votes, there were apprehension, last night that it might be difficult for any of the three candidates to get a simple majority and 25 per cent of the votes scored in at least two-thirds (24) of Nigeria’s 36 states and the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja required to be declared winner outright.
Results from state collation centres show Tinubu to be leading in South-est even though he lost two of the six states; and making impact in some North-East, North-Central and North-West states and Rivers State.
Also, Atiku, who claimed a state in the South-West, made impact in Akwa Ibom and is doing well in Northern states.
In like manner, Obi, who won Lagos is strong in South-East, parts of South-South and North-Central and Abuja.
What the law says
Section 134 of the Constitution provides as follows:
(1) A candidate for an election to the office of President shall be deemed to have been duly elected, where, there being only two candidates for the election –
(a) he has the majority of votes cast at the election; and
(b) he has not less than one-quarter of the votes cast at the election in each of at least two-thirds of all the States in the Federation and the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja.
(2) A candidate for an election to the office of President shall be deemed to have been duly elected where, there being more than two candidates for the election-
(a) he has the highest number of votes cast at the election;
and
(b) he has not less than one-quarter of the votes cast at the election each of at least two-thirds of all the States in the Federation and the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja.
(3) In a default of a candidate duly elected in accordance with subsection (2) of this section their shall be a second election in accordance with subsection (4) of this section at which the only candidate shall be –
(a) the candidate who scored the highest number of votes at any election held in accordance with the said subsection (2) of this section; and
(b) one among the remaining candidates who has a majority of votes in the highest number of states, so however that where there are more than one candidate with majority of votes in the highest number of states, the candidate among them with the highest total of votes cast at the election shall be the second candidate for the election.
(4) In default of a candidate duly elected under the foregoing subsections, the Independent National Electoral Commission shall within seven days of the result of the election held under the said subsections, arrange for an election between the two candidates and a candidate at such election shall be deemed elected to the office of President if –
(a) he has a majority of votes cast at the election; and
(b) he has not less than one-quarter of the votes cast at the election in each of at least two-thirds of all the States in the Federation and the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja
(5) In default of a candidate duly elected under subsection (4) of this section, the Independent National Electoral Commission shall, within seven days of the result of the election held under the aforesaid subsection (4), arrange for another election between the two candidates to which the subsection relates and a candidate at such election shall be deemed to have been duly elected to the office of President, if he has a majority of the votes cast at the election.
Election results announced so far are as follows:
1. Ekiti state
APC – 201,494
PDP – 89,554
LP – 11,397
2. Kwara state
APC – 263,572
PDP – 136,909
LP – 31,166
3. Ondo
APC – 369, 924
PDP – 115, 463
LP – 47, 350
4. Osun
APC – 343,945
PDP – 354,366
LP – 23,283
5. Oyo
APC – 449,884
PDP – 182, 977
LP – 99,110
6. Yobe
APC: 151, 459
PDP – 198,567
LP – 2,406
7. Ogun
APC – 341,554
PDP – 123,831
LP – 85, 829
8. Enugu
APC – 4,772
PDP – 15,749
LP – 428, 640
9. Lagos
APC – 572, 606
PDP – 582, 454
PDP – 75, 750
10. Gombe
APC – 146,977
PDP – 319,123
LP – 26, 160
EKWEREMADU: Doctor lied to have kidney transplant, court told
A NIGERIAN doctor has
admitted in court that he lied about a potential kidney donor because he was “desperate” for his own operation to go ahead.
Dr Obinna Obeta, 51, is accused of being part of an international criminal conspiracy in a organ transplant trafficking plot.
The Old Bailey heard how Dr Obeta had travelled with a donor from Nigeria in 2021 who he incorrectly said was his cousin.
He denies breaking modern slavery laws.
Former Nigerian politician Ike Ekweremadu, 60, is accused of bringing a man to the UK to provide a kidney for his daughter Sonia.
Ekweremadu, his wife Beatrice, 56, and daughter Sonia, 25, deny conspiring to arrange or facilitate the travel of the young man to Britain with a view to his exploitation in May 2022.
Dr Obeta is accused of being an associate in the plot.
Yesterday, the court heard how Dr Obeta had successfully undergone a kidney transplant in the UK in 2021, with a donor travelling from Nigeria who was said to be his cousin.
But asked by his defence barrister, Sally Howes KC, if the man was in fact his cousin, Dr Obeta admitted that he was not.
“No, he’s not a blood relative. I wish to apologise for that,” Dr Obeta said.
“At that point I was really desperate to survive,” he added.
Asked if he accepted that by identifying him as a cousin that was a lie, Dr Obeta said: “I’m not proud of that.”
‘Others in mind’
Dr Obeta denied that he had offered any money for the donor’s kidney, or any kind of reward and told the court that he had kept in touch with the man after the operation.
“He was more like my son at this point,” Dr Obeta said.
The court heard that after his operation, Dr Obeta had contacted his donor to ask if he was able to find any further potential donors.
“There were others I had in mind. It’s not an easy task,” said Dr Obeta.
He told the court that he needed to know the motives of potential donors, while others were not going to have kidneys that matched.
Source: Vanguard news
Leave a Reply