Peter Obi To Play Two Videos Clips At Presidential Election Tribunal As Evidence Against Tinubu, APC

Share this:

The videos were submitted by Peter Obi through a subpoenaed witness to prove his petition against the victory of Bola Tinubu of APC in the 2023 presidential election.

The video clips of interview with the chairman of Independent National Electoral Commission, INEC, Prof. Mahmood Yakubu and the Commission’s National Commissioner and Chairman of the Information and Voter Education Committee, Festus Okoye on the 2023 election tendered as evidence by Peter Obi and Labour Party would be played at the Presidential Election Petition Court, PEPC, today, Saturday.

The videos were submitted by Peter Obi through a subpoenaed witness to prove his petition against the victory of Bola Tinubu of APC in the 2023 presidential election.

PEPC had on Friday admitted the videos of the interview recorded in a flash drive in evidence after stiff resistance from lawyers to the respondents.

At the resumed hearing of the petition, Jubrin Okitepa, SAN counsel to Peter Obi also called a subpoenaed witness from Channels TV, named Lucky Obowo-Isawode, a reporter and editor.

The counsel informed the court that two subpoenas dated May 30 and June 6 were served on the TV station to produce the video clips.

The respondents counsel are Kemi Pinhero, SAN for INEC, Akin Olujimi, SAN for president Tinubu and Vice president Shettima, Afolabi Fashanu, SAN for APC .

They all did not oppose the witness but objected to his adoption of his statement on oath.

Olujimi for the 2nd and 3rd respondents objected to the adoption of his witness statement on oath.

According to him, it is against the provision in the Electoral Act.

“It is settled that election petition must be filed within 21 days after the announcement of the election. The documents sent out must be accompanied by the petition, list of witnesses and their statements.

“The witness statement was filed today, three months after the announcement of the results,” he said.

He added that he has looked at the pages of petition and did not see the name of the witness.

“The witness is not competent to testify before this court, this point has been settled in the decision of this court,” he said.

Pinhero aligned with the submission by Olujimi.

“The petitioners were aware of the videos and ought to have filed it along with the petition as required by the law,” he said.

He therefore urged the court to discountenance the adoption and uphold the objection.

Fashanu for APC aligned with the submissions of the other respondents’ counsel.

He added that there was no distinction between a subpoenaed witness and ordinary witness for the purposes of compliance.

He therefore urged the court to uphold the objection and refuse the adoption for void of merit.

Okitepa told the court if there is something to dismiss, it is the objections of the respondents.

He told the court that the evidence the subpoenaed witness brought were live interviews with INEC chairman and Mr Festus Okoye.

The videos flash drive was tendered and admitted in evidence and the counsel prayed that it should be played.

Olujimi objected that it should not be played because the flash drive was not served on them.

Obi and his Labour Party (LP) are petitioners in the petition marked CA/PEPC/03/2023 challenging the election which brought president Bola Tinubu into power

The respondents are; the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), President Bola Tinubu and his Vice, Kashim Shettima and the All Progressives Congress (APC).

Share this:

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.